The New Patriotic Party (NPP) communicator asserted that such a tragic loss of life would not have occurred if his party had remained in power, a claim that has since drawn mixed reactions from citizens, analysts, and political opponents.
Speaking in the wake of the disaster, Ahiagbah argued that the NPP administration had stronger systems in place for flood prevention, including improved drainage infrastructure, proactive desilting of waterways, and stricter enforcement against illegal structures on flood-prone lands.
According to him, these measures significantly reduced the risk of flooding during the party’s tenure and demonstrated a higher level of preparedness in managing environmental threats.
However, critics have quickly pushed back, describing the statement as insensitive and overly politicized, especially at a time when families are mourning their loved ones.
Many argue that flooding is a long-standing national challenge that transcends political administrations, pointing to years of poor urban planning, rapid population growth, and climate change as contributing factors.
Policy experts have also weighed in, emphasizing that while governance plays a role in disaster prevention, no single administration can completely eliminate natural disasters.
They stress the need for continuity in infrastructure projects, non-partisan collaboration, and long-term urban planning reforms to address the root causes of flooding.
Meanwhile, affected communities continue to grapple with the aftermath, calling for immediate relief efforts and sustainable solutions to prevent future tragedies.
As the debate intensifies, Ahiagbah’s remarks have once again highlighted how national disasters often become flashpoints in Ghana’s highly charged political landscape.
0 Comments